Lesson 23: Future in Nif'al and Hitpa'el. The Imperative in All Binyanim. Conversational "Imperative = Future." Negative Imperative with אל

Vocabulary: instructions, requests, directions, advice

How to work with this lesson

  1. Read — understand the rule (5 minutes, no more!)
  2. Break it into root + pattern — each verb: which root, which binyan, which person.
  3. Run the scales — ani → ata → at → hu → hi → anachnu → atem → aten → hem → hen. For the imperative — only ata / at / atem / aten (4 forms, addressed at the listener).
  4. Train the conversational shift — drive every classical kton into the modern tikhtov. On the street you'll hear the second, in the textbook you'll see the first.
  5. Memorize the negation algorithm — the imperative is negated with אל (al), not לא (lo). This must become a reflex.

5% — understand the rule: future in Nif'al and Hitpa'el is built with the same prefix-suffix template as L21; the imperative is "cut-down" 2nd-person future. 95% — train so that tikhtov, tikhtevi, tikhtevu fly out without pause, and al + future becomes an automatic "don't."


Part 1: Where we are on the map of binyanim and tenses

After lessons 21–22 you have in hand:

  • Future in Pa'al, Pi'el, Hif'il (L21) — prefixes e-/ti-/yi-/ni- + gender-number suffixes.
  • Reading without nikkud (L22) — vowels you now restore by root and pattern.

In this lesson we close the future for two more binyanim (Nif'al and Hitpa'el — the two main "passive-reflexive" patterns), and immediately move on to the next level — the imperative mood. It has two lives in Hebrew:

  • Classical (grammatically correct) — separate forms (kton, kabel, hashlem).
  • Conversational (what you'll hear on the street) — simply the 2nd-person future with the meaning of a command: tikhtov, tedaber, telkhi.

Both are alive. Knowing both is mandatory.

Pay attention to negation. In the past and present, "not" = lo (lo katavti — "I didn't write," lo kotev — "doesn't write"). In the imperative — "not" = אל (al) + 2nd-person future. al tikhtov — "don't write." Lo tikhtov in this meaning is a mistake. Lo tikhtov can only be said as a statement of fact about the future: "you will not write."


Part 2: Future in Nif'al

Nif'al (L16) is the passive or middle partner of Pa'al: lehikanes ("to enter, be admitted"), lehishaer ("to stay"), leihaled ("to be born"), lehipagesh ("to meet").

In the future tense Nif'al is recognized by two markers:

  • The person prefix — the same as in Pa'al (e-, ti-, yi-, ni-), but with the vowel "i" in the root itself.
  • Inside the stem — the characteristic Nif'al "look": ...ka-NES, ...sha-ER, ...pa-GESH.

Paradigm: root כ-נ-ס (k-n-s, "to enter") → Nif'al future

PersonHebrewTranslitEnglish
aniאכנסekanesI will enter
ataתכנסtikanesyou will enter (m.)
atתכנסיtikansiyou will enter (f.)
huיכנסyikaneshe will enter
hiתכנסtikanesshe will enter
anachnuנכנסnikaneswe will enter
atem/atenתכנסוtikansuyou (pl.) will enter
hem/henיכנסוyikansuthey will enter

Overlap to watch for: ata and hi — one form (tikanes). In modern Hebrew, atem and aten also merged into one (tikansu) — this is the norm since L21.

Compare Pa'al and Nif'al in the future on one root

The root כ-נ-ס (k-n-s) lives in two binyanim:

BinyanMeaninghu (he) — future
Pa'al — לכנוס (literary, rare)to gatheryikhnos
Nif'al — להיכנס (everyday)to enteryikanes

The difference: the prefix is the same (yi-), but in Nif'al — "i" in the stem (yi-ka-nes), and in Pa'al — "o" (yi-khnos). That's your identifying mark.

More roots in the Nif'al future

RootInfinitiveMeaninganihuhem
ש-א-רלהישאר lehisha'erto stayesha'eryisha'eryisha'aru
פ-ג-שלהיפגש lehipageshto meetepageshyipageshyipagshu
ז-כ-רלהיזכר lehizakherto recallezakheryizakheryizakhru
ר-א-הלהיראות lehera'otto look, seemera'eyera'eyera'u
ש-מ-רלהישמר lehishamerto be cautiouseshameryishameryishamru

Recognition hint in unpointed text: you see a future form with prefix ת/י/א/נ, and immediately after the prefix — the letter י (a mater lectionis giving "i"): תיכנס, יישאר — this is most likely Nif'al.


Part 3: Future in Hitpa'el

Hitpa'el (L17) is the reflexive/reciprocal binyan: lehitlabesh ("to get dressed"), lehitkatev ("to correspond"), lehitpate'ach ("to develop"). Recognized by the prefix הת- (hit-) in past and infinitive.

In the future the letter ה drops from the prefix, leaving only -ת- (metathesis with sibilants of the root, as in L17, also stays).

Paradigm: root ל-ב-ש (l-b-sh, "to dress" — Hitpa'el) → future

PersonHebrewTranslitEnglish
aniאתלבשetlabeshI will get dressed
ataתתלבשtitlabeshyou (m.) will get dressed
atתתלבשיtitlabshiyou (f.) will get dressed
huיתלבשyitlabeshhe will get dressed
hiתתלבשtitlabeshshe will get dressed
anachnuנתלבשnitlabeshwe will get dressed
atem/atenתתלבשוtitlabshuyou (pl.) will get dressed
hem/henיתלבשוyitlabshuthey will get dressed

The double "t" (תת, תת) is not a typo. The first ת is the person prefix (ti-), the second ת is what's left from הת-. Double "t" is the signature of Hitpa'el in the future for ata/at/hi/atem.

Metathesis in the future

If a root begins with a sibilant (ש, שׂ, ז, צ, ס) — the ת letter of the binyan swaps with it (the rule from L17). In the future this is preserved.

RootInfinitiveMetathesis?hu — future
ש-מ-שלהשתמש lehishtamesh — to useyes, ת↔שyishtamesh
ס-ד-רלהסתדר lehistader — to manage, get alongyes, ת↔סyistader
צ-ל-םלהצטלם lehitstalem — to be photographedyes, ת→ט next to צyitstalem
ז-ק-נלהזדקן lehizdaken — to grow oldyes, ת→ד next to זyizdaken
ל-ב-שלהתלבש lehitlabesh — to get dressednoyitlabesh
ק-ש-רלהתקשר lehitkasher — to call (on phone)noyitkasher

Useful Hitpa'el verbs in the future

RootInfinitiveMeaninganihu
כ-ת-בלהתכתב lehitkatevto correspondetkatevyitkatev
פ-ת-חלהתפתח lehitpate'achto developetpate'achyitpate'ach
ר-ג-ללהתרגל lehitragelto get used toetragelyitragel
ק-ל-חלהתקלח lehitkale'achto take a showeretkale'achyitkale'ach
ע-נ-י-נלהתעניין lehitanyento be interestedetanyenyitanyen
ח-ת-נלהתחתן lehitchatento get marriedetchatenyitchaten

Part 4: The imperative mood — classical form

In classical Hebrew the imperative consists of separate forms, made by "cutting off" the prefix of the 2nd-person future. There are four: to a man (ata), to a woman (at), to a male/mixed group (atem), to a female group (aten — in modern Hebrew it has practically merged with atem).

Pa'al — imperative

Base model: "o" vowel in the stem.

RootTo m. (ata)To f. (at)To pl. (atem)English
כ-ת-בktov כתובkitvi כתביkitvu כתבוwrite
ש-מ-רshmor שמורshimri שמריshimru שמרוguard, keep
ל-מ-דlmad למדlimdi למדיlimdu למדוstudy
ע-מ-דamod עמודimdi עמדיimdu עמדוstand / get up
ק-ר-אkra קראkir'i קראיkir'u קראוread / call

Clarification: for the root כ-ת-ב the classical imperative form is kton (with "n" instead of "v"), from the same root in different vocalization. In living language it's heard less; "ktov" today is fine in instructions too.

Pi'el — imperative

In Pi'el the imperative sounds almost like the present, but without the prefix.

RootTo m. (ata)To f. (at)To pl. (atem)English
ד-ב-רdaber דברdabri דבריdabru דברוspeak
ב-ק-שbakesh בקשbakshi בקשיbakshu בקשוask, request
ק-ב-לkabel קבלkabli קבליkablu קבלוreceive, accept
ס-פ-רsaper ספרsapri ספריsapru ספרוtell
ש-ל-מshalem שלםshalmi שלמיshalmu שלמוpay

Hif'il — imperative

In Hif'il the imperative starts with ha-.

RootTo m. (ata)To f. (at)To pl. (atem)English
ש-ל-מhashlem השלםhashlimi השלימיhashlimu השלימוcomplete
כ-נ-סhakhnes הכנסhakhnisi הכניסיhakhnisu הכניסוbring in, let in
ס-ב-רhasber הסברhasbiri הסביריhasbiru הסבירוexplain
ז-מ-נhazmen הזמןhazmini הזמיניhazminu הזמינוinvite / order
ח-ל-טhachlet החלטhachliti החליטיhachlitu החליטוdecide

Nif'al — imperative

In Nif'al the imperative starts with hi-.

RootTo m. (ata)To f. (at)English
כ-נ-סhikanes היכנסhikansi היכנסיenter
ש-א-רhisha'er הישארhisha'ari הישאריstay
ז-ה-רhizaher היזהרhizahari היזהריbe careful
פ-ג-שhipagesh היפגשhipagshi היפגשיmeet (someone)

Hitpa'el — imperative

In Hitpa'el the imperative starts with hit- (i.e., infinitive without ל-).

RootTo m. (ata)To f. (at)English
ל-ב-שhitlabesh התלבשhitlabshi התלבשיget dressed
ק-ש-רhitkasher התקשרhitkashri התקשריcall (phone)
ר-ג-לhitragel התרגלhitragli התרגליget used to
י-ש-בhityashev התיישבhityashvi התיישביsit down, settle in

Remember the logic: imperative = "infinitive minus ל-", often

In three "heavy" binyanim (Hif'il, Nif'al, Hitpa'el) the classical imperative = infinitive minus ל-:

  • lehashlim "to complete" → hashlem "complete!"
  • lehikanes "to enter" → hikanes "enter!"
  • lehitlabesh "to dress" → hitlabesh "dress!"

This hack saves the brain: know the infinitive, know the imperative.


Part 5: Conversational rule — imperative = 2nd-person future

This is the single most important rule of the lesson for living Hebrew. Memorize it like this:

In modern colloquial Hebrew, the classical imperative (kton, kabel, hashlem) is rarely heard. Instead, you use the 2nd-person future: tikhtov, tekabel, tashlim. By form — future, by meaning — command.

Example of the shift on one verb

RegisterTo a manTo a womanTo pluralMeaning
Classicalktovkitvikitvuwrite!
Conversationaltikhtov atatikhtevi attikhtevuwrite (you)

Literally tikhtov ata — "you will write," but in the context of a request/command it sounds like "write." Often bevakasha is added for softening: "tikhtov li bevakasha" — "write to me, please."

Which form you'll hear when

FormWhere it lives
Classical (kton, daber, hashlem)Instructions, announcements, military commands, signs, literature, songs, formal register
Future-as-imperative (tikhtov, tedaber, tashlim)Everyday speech, between friends, in the family, in a store, in a taxi

"Classic vs. street" table

Root / BinyanClassicStreet (2-pers. fut.)Meaning
כ-ת-ב Pa'alktovtikhtovwrite
ד-ב-ר Pi'eldabertedaberspeak
ב-ק-ש Pi'elbakeshtevakeshask
ק-ב-ל Pi'elkabeltekabelreceive
ש-ל-מ Hif'ilhashlemtashlimcomplete
ה-ב-נ Hif'ilhaventavinunderstand
כ-נ-ס Nif'alhikanestikanesenter
ל-ב-ש Hitpa'elhitlabeshtitlabeshget dressed
ק-ש-ר Hitpa'elhitkashertitkashercall
ב-ו-א Pa'albo (irreg.)tavocome
ה-ל-ך Pa'allekh (irreg.)telekhgo (m.)
ה-ל-ך Pa'allekhi (irreg.)telkhigo (f.)

Notice: the verbs of motion bo ("come"), lekh/lekhi ("go"), kakh/kchi ("take") in their classical form are very frequent — you'll hear them in living speech. But "kton," "shmor" — less often; more often "tikhtov," "tishmor."


Part 6: Negative imperative — אל (al) + future

Here you need to be very careful.

Rule: the imperative is negated with אל (al), not לא (lo).

Affirmative (request)Prohibition
ktov / tikhtov — "write!"al tikhtov — "don't write!"
daber / tedaber — "speak!"al tedaber — "don't speak!"
lekh / telekh — "go!" (m.)al telekh — "don't go!" (m.)
lekhi / telkhi — "go!" (f.)al telkhi — "don't go!" (f.)
bo / tavo — "come!"al tavo — "don't come!"

Why specifically אל and not לא?

  • לא (lo) — negation for the past and present, and also for a statement-of-fact future:
    • lo katavti — "I didn't write" (past)
    • ani lo kotev — "I'm not writing" (present)
    • hu lo yikhtov — "he won't write" (future as a statement)
  • אל (al) — negation only for the imperative meaning, always with a 2nd-person future form:
    • al tikhtov — "don't write!" (command-prohibition)
    • al tedabri — "don't speak!" (to a woman)
    • al telkhi — "don't go!" (to a woman)

Compare, so as not to confuse

HebrewTranslitEnglish
הוא לא ידברhu lo yedaberhe won't speak (statement)
אל תדברal tedaberdon't speak! (prohibition to a man)
אל תדבריal tedabridon't speak! (prohibition to a woman)
היא לא תבואhi lo tavoshe won't come (statement)
אל תבואal tavodon't come! (prohibition to a man)

Trap: "al tedaber" and "hi lo tedaber" (she won't speak) — both verb forms are identical (tedaber — both 2nd-pers. m. and 3rd-pers. f. future). You tell them apart by the particle (lo vs. al) and by meaning.

With the negative imperative — always the conversational form

Notice an interesting fact: there is no classical form of the negative imperative in modern Hebrew. You can't say "al ktov." Only al tikhtov. This means that the conversational shift "imperative = future" in negation is mandatory, across all registers.


Part 7: Imperatives and requests — softening

A "bare" imperative — even the conversational one (tikhtov!) — sounds harsh. In polite speech you add:

Word/phraseTranslitMeaning
בבקשהbevakashaplease
אוליulaimaybe…
אפשר ש-efshar she-could you…, is it possible that…
תרצה / תרצי + inf.tirtse / tirtsiwould you like… (literally "will you want…")
נאnaplease (literary, in signs)

Politeness scale from blunt to soft

LevelExampleWhen
Blunt / dryshev! שב"sit!" — command
Neutralteshev תשבfuture-as-imperative
Politeteshev bevakasha תשב בבקשה"please sit"
Very politeulai teshev? אולי תשב?"maybe you'd sit down?"
Literary/officialna lashevet נא לשבת"please be seated" (via infinitive)

A note on the last level: in official signage ("please don't smoke," "please close the door") instead of the imperative there's often נא + infinitive: na lo le'ashen — "please don't smoke." This is the formal register.


Next up: Lesson 24 — The binyanim Pu'al and Huf'al, the internal passives of Pi'el and Hif'il. You'll learn how the same root switches from active "he received" (kibel — Pi'el) to passive "was received" (kubal — Pu'al), and from "he invited" (hizmin — Hif'il) to "was invited" (huzman — Huf'al). These are the last two binyanim on the map — after L24 you'll have all seven in hand.

Lesson 23: Future in Nif'al and Hitpa'el. The Imperative in All Binyanim. Conversational "Imperative = Future." Negative Imperative with אל · עברית · Glottos Matrix